MABO wrote:One question: Is there a special army of Belisarius you would like to create? He fought a lot of battles in different parts of the empire, so I was wondering, if he maybe had each time a different combination of troops and units assembled as an army.
I also returned to your webside. Même si je connais un peu le français, ce n'est pas suffisant pour lire et comprendre tous les textes. (But even though I know a little French, it is not enough to read and understand all the texts.)
Maybe you find the time to give some hints on your army and the time, if there is a special one. But it might also possible that I overestimated the differences in the armies Belisarius led.
In any case: What an interesting project!
that's an interesting question!
There are several ways to answer it. Historically, Belisarius' army is not that different from that of the late Roman Empire.
it inherited it in the structure, organization and chain of command.
On the other hand, the army of Belisarius is very changed on two:
1. unlike all the Roman armies that preceded it, it actually only relies on a core of elite troops, like the barbarian armies. Interestingly, all battles are now resolved by knocking out the enemy's best units, including Roman ones. The homogeneous Roman army, which made it almost invisible (or not far!) No longer exists. It is interesting to note the number of defeats suffered by the armies of Belisarius, especially at the start of his career against the Sassanids. There was certainly the great victory of Dara, but also 4 terrible defeats, including at least two under his command, and two others where he participated. But each time the best Roman troops were not annihilated, so the empire did not lose its ability to face its opponent.
the consequence is a two-speed, composed army, with a command that takes it into account, and a more "volatile" army, regularly subjected to mutinies and dislocation. More than once during his campaign in Africa, Bélisaire confronts the vandals, with his Huns ... behind his back, who do not take part in the battle! The huns preferred to wait to see who would emerge victorious from the battle before joining her !!
it would obviously never have happened in a Roman army of previous eras. At worst, like Aetius against Attila in the battle of Campus Mauriacum, the elements considered unreliable (there the Alans) were put in the front line and "framed" by the Roman elements ....
2. the place of the cavalry: it is now fundamental. The buccellarii, the elite of the army of Belisarius, are heavy horsemen who wield the bow to perfection, and who devastate the barbarian ranks who do not master this weapon, or very little. infantry, now serves only as a foothold on the battlefield, and especially as a garrison.
to finish answering your question, the army has always remained the same, with one difference: it has been enriched with the campaigns of new contingents. Either taken from the borders to support the war effort (Perso-Armenians, Isaurians, Slavs ...), or from prisoners taken previously (Persians, Vandals, Goths ...).
In addition, the imperial power made a big effort of local recruitment on all the reoccupied territories, by raising "numerus" which traditionally bear the name of the city in which they were recruited and which they keep:
Mediolanenses, attested at the end of VIth century in Ravenna, created in Milan after the Gothic War.
Veronenses, attested at the end of VIth century in Ravenna, created in Verona after the Gothic War.
Tarvisiani, a cavalry regiment attested in Grado in year 579.
Ravennates in Ravenna
Argentes, stationed in Argenta's castrum (Ferrara), built at the beginning of the VIIth century.
Ariminenses, attested in Rimini in the VIIIth century but probably created at a earlier date (maybe 590).
Numerus Centumcellensis, attested in Civitavecchia only in the VIIIth century but maybe created at a earlier date.
In a next answer, i'll tell you what will be my option in building my arly !
PS : i know i should translate my website, it's just... too much work!